Iran is willing to restart nuclear negotiations with Washington as long as it is handled with "respect" and "respect", Iran's top diplomat has stated.
The Iranian diplomat said only diplomacy produced results, and shared new appeals had come from mediators to restart discussions with the US government. He said Iran did not have secret atomic facilities, and Iran could not yet authorize the International Atomic Energy Agency to visit bombed nuclear sites for security reasons.
Araghchi is walking a challenging route since Iran does not want be perceived to be acting from a position of weakness, and he consistently maintained that Iran had arisen more powerful militarily and mentally from the joint assault on its nuclear sites in June.
He was speaking at a defense forum in Tehran where he restated that Iran had "a fundamental entitlement to process nuclear material domestically that it will perpetually retain" – the main reason of the deadlock in the earlier negotiations.
The earlier sessions of talks between the United States and Iran were brought to an abrupt and bitter termination on 12 June when the Israeli government, with US support, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump claiming the facilities had been eliminated. Following this, EU nations employed their privilege to restore global restrictions, but Iran maintains they have not had a major impact.
Iranian officials claimed they felt they had reached a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in earlier negotiations, when it was agreed an domestic cooperative with US participation could process nuclear material. Each party would have been able to claim victory since home-based processing would have remained and the US could be assured that Iran's enrichment initiative was exclusively peaceful.
It had not been agreed in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could operate inside Iran, but that was a logical implication of the partnership suggestion. Diplomats stated three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy the US official only for the arrangement to disintegrate due to "spoilers in Washington".
Iran's diplomats said the consortium offer was now off the table, but it seems very probable the proposal could be revived in certain ways if negotiations restart.
The US president in recent days stated he had been receiving messages that Iran sought to reopen negotiations, but privately Iranian officials state they are not yet obtaining coherent offers from America either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Iran's state department has been accused of passivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Tehran says diplomacy is not part of a performance.
In his remarks to the forum, designed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the notion of international law, Araghchi declared the fortnight-long engagement showed the conflict could not be ended by military means. He said the strikes commenced with a US demand for an unconditional Iranian surrender and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.
Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were mounted with full US knowledge and coordination, making trust challenging to reestablish.
Araghchi declared: "Tehran was not the one that had deserted dialogue; it was America and the European states that had consistently tried to impose their demands during the talks. Dialogue can still be alive and remains the final resolution to address conflicts, but its standards, guidelines and tenets must be adhered to."
"Provided that they talk to the Iranian people with the tone of dignity and honor, they will get a answer in the same tone."
In what is described by Iranian officials as the conflict of recovery and rebuilding, Araghchi claimed he was confident Iran's security strengths "have significantly improved than preceding 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been rebuilt. We acquired many lessons from this war; we have discovered our personal limitations and the shortcomings of the opponent."
He continued: "We effectively endured this war. Our atomic expertise, which they intended to eliminate, continues to exist. The sites and equipment, if destroyed, will be restored; what is crucial is the resolve of the Iranian people and then the national cohesion that they targeted, but did not succeed to destroy. The nation of Iran have developed stronger, more cohesive, and more endorsing of the government and the state in the wake of this assault."
A senior web developer and digital strategist with over 10 years of experience, specializing in responsive design and user-centered interfaces.